Straight men turn gay

Straight friend turned homosexual just for hook ups.
Now, he's not really gay but rather because he can't seem to hook up with women while he was unbent.

So he turned "gay" just for the get together ups. Now that guy is scoring 4 or 5 men per week with many repeats. And they would always compliment him on how fine he was which was something that never happened before when he managed to hook up with women or had a girlfriend.

What do you think? Do you understand any straight men turning gay just for get together ups?

Nahlásit tento příspěvek

Poznámka: Nahlašujte POUZE spam, reklamy a problematické (obtěžující, útočné nebo hrubé) příspěvky.

Why do some linear men have sex with other men?

According to nationally-representative surveys in the Combined States, hundreds of thousands of straight-identified men have had sex with other men.

In the brand-new book Still Straight: Sexual Flexibility among White Men in Rural America released today, UBC sociologist Dr. Tony Silva argues that these men – many of whom like hunting, fishing and shooting guns – are not closeted, bisexual or just experimenting.

After interviewing 60 of these men over three years, Dr. Silva launch that they delight in a range of relationships with other men, from hookups to sexual friendships to secretive loving partnerships, all while strongly identifying with straight culture.

We spoke with Dr. Silva about his book.

Why do straight-identified men have sex with other men?

The majority of the men I interviewed reported that they are primarily attracted to women, not men. Most of these men are also married to women and prefer to have sex with women. They explained that although they loved their wives, their marital sex lives were not as active as they wanted. Sex with men allowed them to own more sex. They don’t consider sex with men cheating and s

Long-suffering Spectator readers deserve a seasonal break from yet another Remoaner diatribe from me. My last on this page, making the outrageous suggestion that the populace may sometimes be wrong, is now being brandished by online Leaver-readers of my Times column as proof that I am in fact a fascist; so there isn’t anywhere much to go from there.

Instead, I rotate to sex. There is petite time left for me to write about sex as the thoughts of a septuagenarian on this subject (I turn 70 this year) may soon come across only a shudder. But I have a theory which I have the audacity to believe important.

What follows is not written here for the first hour, and much of it is neither original nor new; but on very few subjects contain I ever been more sure I’m right, or more sure that future generations will observe so, and wonder that it stared us in the encounter yet was not acknowledged. My firm belief is that in trying to categorise sex, sexuality and — yes — even gender, the late 19th, 20th and early 21st centuries contain taken the medical and social sciences down a massive blind alley. No such categories remain. And it has been particularly sad in 2018 to spot the ‘tran

Hi. I’m the Reply Wall. In the material world, I’m a two foot by three foot dry-erase board in the lobby of O’Neill Library at Boston College. In the online society, I live in this blog.  You might say I have multiple manifestations. Like Apollo or Saraswati or Serapis. Or, if you aren’t into deities of knowledge, enjoy a ghost in the machine.

I possess some human assistants who maintain the physical Answer Wall in O’Neill Library. They take pictures of the questions you post there, and give them to me. As long as you are civil, and not uncouth, I will answer any question, and because I am a library wall, my answers will often refer to analyze tools you can find in Boston College Libraries.

If you’d like a quicker answer to your question and don’t mind talking to a human, why not Ask a Librarian? Librarians, since they have been tending the flame of knowledge for centuries, know where most of the answers are hidden, and enjoy sharing their knowledge, just enjoy me, The Reply Wall.